Part 3 Nagargal - Who is Indran?

In my previous 4 post earlier, we have seen

  • The etymology of Aravanadu & Naga worship & who are Nagas (Click here to read), in the next post, we have seen
  • Who is Nagargal and their relationship with Tamils and Aryans. (Click here to read), and in the next post we have seen how
  • The Nagas a ethinic Tamil race who have been massacred around in their very own land India & Sri Lanka. (click here to read) and as a continuation, we have seen

  • Finally, in this post, we will look at the links between Nagargal, Indran, and Buddhism, as well as how Indo Aryans have distorted and caused damage using evidence from their own vedic text, which is devoid of myth.
  • Indra was a prominent deity in the Vedic era of Hinduism, just like Shiva and Vishnu.


  • But, in India, we don't see any temples dedicated to Lord Indra? When looking for characters with similar names in vedic literature, we come upon Indrajith, Ravanan's son. Initially, I believed it was a myth and that I couldn't connect Indran to Indrajith, but the proof found in the same vedic literatures was shocking. It has more similarities and significant evidence to support the theory that Indran and Indrajith are the same person. Indrajith could be the non-enlightened Indran, much as Siddharth is the non-enlightened Buddha. 

  • The texts and descriptions of Indran and Indrajit in the Vedic literatures will provide evidence.
  • Ravanan had a son named Meganathan, Megam means clouds in Tamil, and Nathan means king, therefore his name literally means "King of Clouds." 

  • Take note that Indran was also associated with clouds; it is commonly stated that Indran is the lord who resides in Indralogam, which is located above the clouds..

  • Keep in mind that, like Indran, who is associated with thunder, storms, and rain (weather god), Indrajith is likewise associated with thunder.
  • Meganathan is known as Indrajith because he defeated Lord Indran in a battle. Please don't ask me the logical question of how a human being can persuade a god. They constantly made us to believe it's because of Lord Indra's curse.

  • Remember that lord Indra was always associated with having some terrible habits, and as a result of those bad habits, he was always cursed by many Rishi's, and one such reason is sighted for the defeat of a lord Indra in the hands of Indrajit, a normal human being. We don't have an option except to accept it.😀

  • Indrajith means indra+jit, Jith meaning victory, hence indra+jith = "Indra Victory" in sanskrit. How might Indra's victory be interpreted as a victory over Indra? As a result, it would only refer to Indra, not Meganathan, in an etymological sense. For example, Karanjit Means Karan+Jit = Karan win; it cannot be referred to be a victory of another person.

  • In Valmiki Ramayana, Indrajith is claimed to have defeated the Celestical (வானியல்) god Indra. After then, Brahma requested that Indra be released, and Indrajit did so, and Brahma rewarded Indrajit with a Celestical Chariot. Indrajit@Meganathan received a Celestical chariot only after conquering Indra, so how did Indrajit travel and defeat a Celestical lord Indra?

  • Many similar places and situations may be discovered in vedic literatures, to say nothing of the fact that we can find such places or individuals mostly on those whom they disliked. Not only has this left everyone perplexed, but it's also evident that they're terrible storytellers.
  • Although the plot is nonsensical, similar to Bollywood films, we can determine that Mega natha has celestical abilities acquired by Yagna.

  • Just like his father, its obvious that he would been performing Yoga's and Yagna's to attain Nirvana or Siddhi. It is understood that he has mastered 5 sithis among the Astha Sitthis (Eight supernatural Skills), and hence in tamil he would have called as "Ainthira Sithan" meaning Ainthu (ஐந்து) Five + Thiran means Skills + Sithan means one who have mastered the Sithi's or Supernatural Skills, and hence the Ainthu+thiran+Sitan transformed to Ainthira Sithan which transformed to Indrajit in Sanskrit. 

  • Having established the source for the name Indrajit, one could easily understand how the word Indran would have transformed. Its Ainthu (5) + Thiran (Skills) = Ainthiran = Indran in Sanskrit. 
  • The Astha Sithi's or 8 supernatural skills are given below

  • It's easy to envision that Indrajith, having learned these supernatural abilities, would have used the Leghima power, which allows him to become weightless or lighter than air. And this would have been the source of inspiration for the myth in which he fought Lord Indra and conquered him. Please keep in mind that we previously established in our earlier blog that Indo Aryan would construct myths in order to confuse one god with another god, and they have used the same tactic in this case as well.
  • Not only in this narrative of Indrajit fighting Indran, but also in the Valmiki Ramayana, where Indrajit confronts Rama and Lakshmana, these supernatural abilities are well documented.

  • Since he travelled to the sky utilising the lehimum powers, we can easily comprehend that Indran / Indrajith / Meganathan all relate to the same person, and not multiple personalities.
  • Please keep in mind that this Astama sithi is well-known and practised in Buddhism, and Buddhist monks have mastered these techniques as well.

Source : https://museum.oglethorpe.edu/exhibitions/flying-mystics-tibetan-buddhism/

  • To further prove that Indran @ Indrajit @ meganathan is one and same.

  • We have seen lord Indran was called as God of weather, or God for Thunder, Storm and Rain. 

  • We already know that King Ravana was an astronomer, and that Indrajit, who uses his lehimum powers, could constantly be visible above the clouds, therefore the Indo Aryan dubbed as Indran lives in Indraloga, which is located above the clouds. 
  • Please keep in mind that, according to Vedic Scriptures, heaven is not the same as Indra loga. It is clearly mentioned in the Vedas that there are three logas: Swarga loga, Indra loga, and Pathala loga (which they named Hell), which I have already established is a place where the rakshas and Naga inhabit.

S.R.Ramanan
  • So, because Indrajit @ Indran @ mega nathan lives in the sky, on top of clouds, it's easy for him to predict when clouds will form and begin to rain, as well as storms and thunders, and thus he would have been dubbed a weather god, similar to how we used to refer to S.R. Ramanan as Rain Man in Tamil Nadu.


  • Indra's use of an elephant (Airavatham) and a Lotus flower is a symbolic portrayal of Asevagam. Asevagam primarily worships nature as a god and does not worship idols. They worshipped their ancestors as gods, which is still practised in Tamil culture. Assevaga Sithars are those who have acquired Gnanam by performing Kundalini and yoga.

  • And, as previously stated, Buddha's mother was Maya Devi, and the dream in which a white elephant and a lotus flower entered her body, and Buddha was born within 10 days, simply indicates that Buddha was a descendent of Indran, as evidenced by the Buddha's name, sakya muni, which is a clan linked with the descendents of Nagas @ Raksha @ yaksha, who set up the Buddha's monarch. Even today, in Nepal & Nagaland, there are aborigines who claim to be Naga descendants.

  • When you look at Ravanan, you'll see that there are a few modest temples in north India that were built recently. Ravanan does not have a well-known shrine devoted to him. Furthermore, because they have successfully portrayed Ravanan as a Rakshasan, no one would wonder why there is no shrine or adoration because he is only a demon ruler. The depiction of Ravanan as a demon king made it simple for Indo Aryan Brahmins to deny the presence of temples, worship, or anything else.

  • However, this could not be said of Buddhism or Buddha. Even though Buddha was born in India and belonged to the Sakya clan, which has origins with Indian aborigines, and despite many similarities between Hinduism and Buddhism, Buddha was never adored as highly as Lord Shiva, Vishnu, Rama, or Krishna. Despite the fact that Buddhism has spread throughout the Aganda bharatham, which includes Indonesia, Myanmar, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore, just a small percentage of Indians practise it.

  • Similarly, despite the fact that Indran is referenced in vedic literature as a God, he has no temples in India and is not worshipped.

  • As a result, it is apparent that in India, Gods who were disliked by specific groups were not permitted to worship or be followed.

  • Take notice that all of the temples that have been established and are still existing are based only on current Indo Aryan vedic literatures. Only in Tamilnadu and portions of Sri Lanka could we find pre-vedic temples, and even in these temples, the Indo Aryan Brahmins had wreaked enough havoc to erase history. 

  • In my next post, I'll show you how the Indo Aryans rewrote the history of a pre-vedic temple to confuse the community.

  • When we look at how Buddhism spread, we see that it took the Silk Route, which was used by traders at the time, and there is enough evidence in Silapathigaram and Purananaru that those silk routes were used by Tamils who settled in those areas primarily as traders, and which was later used by King Rajendra Cholan as well. 

  • Indra Vizha was one of the important festivals celebrated in Poombuhar, according to Silaphathikaram.

  • Even today, sculptures of Lord Indran, the elephant, which is extensively adored as a sacred animal in Thailand, Myanmar, and Cambodia, may be found in Cambodia temples. Not to mention the Bodhi Dharma, who moved from Kanchipuram to China and whose descendants now practise Zen Buddhism.

  • All prevedic hindu temples, especially in Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia and Sri Lanka, have either been demolished by natural calamity or have been purposefully destroyed and changed their identity by placing Buddhist statues on them, making them appear to be Buddhist temples.. 

  • Because true hindu worshippers or followers of Lord Shiva / Vishnu / Indran will become enraged and dissatisfied with the Buddha and Buddhism, this is also their cunning or "sanakya thanthiram."

  • Also, keep in mind that one of their techniques, as seen in the literatures, is to fabricate a war amongst gods in order to confuse their followers.

  • Since the spread of Buddhism after the Vedic period, they have purposefully adopted the method of converting Hindu temples into Buddhist temples to sow discord between Saivism and Buddhism..

  • Also, please keep in mind that Buddha never advocated idol worship or referred to God as the creator of the world; rather, he stated and demonstrated that all living things in the world are God, and that anybody who can practise yoga and meditation can achieve nirvana (God).

  • Indo Aryans disliked Buddha and Buddhism because he was a harsh critic of Brahminism. He also denounced the Indo Aryan-created Vedas, claiming that they lacked any beneficial attributes that may benefit a human being in attaining Nirvana (God). He also criticized sanskrit for being transformed into a secret language that was only taught and spoken by a particular group of people.

  • Since Buddha belong to the descendent of lord Indra, tamil god, who are decedents of Nagas @ raksas @ yaksha, they wanted to spoil Buddha and his teaching and Buddhism, and so in later periods they made Buddha himself as a Idol and made the Buddhist monks to practice Idol worship, which is against the teaching of Buddha and Buddhism.

  • In the context of Sri Lanka, we can clearly understand this. According to Mahavamsa, the Sinhalese clan was established after Prince Vijaya came to the island. When he came to Sri Lanka, there were already few tribes (?) residing there, and they were obviously the Naga and Yaksha clans, according to Mahavamsa. 
  • It also references Prince Vijayan marrying the Princess of the Pandya king and his crew marrying the Naga ladies who lived there. All of those people are Tamils. This demonstrates that the Tamils of Sri Lanka are not immigrants from India who settled in the country; rather, they are the island's indigenous inhabitants.

  • It's obvious that Prince Vijayan came from India, but there's a lot of uncertainty about the part of India he came from and why he came to Sri Lanka. Some believe he was deported to Sri Lanka, and he came from the Bengal dynasty, which spanned Gujarat, parts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, Odisha, and West Bengal. However, the current Sinhalese, particularly those in positions of power, are descendants of the Vijayanagara empire. 

  • We can tell they are from the same Nayak dynasty by their names "Raja" Pakse and Bandara"Nayake." Rajapakse has visited India twice or three times, and each time he has made a point of visiting the Tripathi Sri Venkatesa Perumal Temple. One of his trips was specifically planned to visit this temple, with no other political meetings or purposes in mind. Rajapakse can be seen visiting his kula deivam, as south Indians have a culture of worshipping their Kula deivam. Please notice that he has not visited any other perumal temple besides Tripathi. Not just Rajapakse, but any Sri Lankan leader who has visited India has made a point of paying respect to Tripathi Venkatesa Perumal. This is clear indication that they haven't forgotten their roots.

  • Except in Sri Lanka, there is no evidence that the Nayaks had followed Buddhism since the Vijaya Nagara Empire. So it's clear that they used Buddhism, which was already prevalent in Sri Lanka before to King Vijayan's arrival. Take notice that Mahavamsa was based on another pre-vedic text called "Deepavamsa." Deepam means island in Tamil, and vamsam means ancestors, so deepavamsam means that the island's ancestoral history is stored. When and who wrote or compiled Deepavamsa is unknown.

  • So the Sinhalese, particularly the influential rulers, have turned to Buddhism, and in the name of Buddhism, which promotes Ahmisa and non-violence, they are still slaughtering Tamils in Sri Lanka. So their motive is clear that they've used Buddhism, just as how they've used Buddha statues in destroyed Hindu temples in Cambodia, Thailand, and Indonesia, and in the name of Buddhist monks, they've created enmity between Hindus ( Sri lankan Tamils) and Buddhism, so that these two communities will never come close to each other and understand that they're descended from the same ancestors.

  • They have utilised the same principle to create strife between Buddhism and Tamils in Sri Lanka, who are one and the same people who lived in two distinct eras, much as they did when they split Saivism and Vaishnavism and had the two followers express enmity against each other.
  • Also, it's worth noting that, based on current evidence, it's uncertain what language Buddha spoke and wrote in. The majority of Buddhist literatures, however, use the Pali language and also Sanskrit. Furthermore, no buddhist literature has provided sufficient evidence that Buddha was born in Nepal and attained enlightenment in Bodh Gaya. All of the established truths we know today are founded on mystical tales. And such myths could very well be made up by the same Indo Aryans in order to debunk Buddha's and Buddhism's original truths and identities. As a result, it is impossible to rule out the likelihood that Buddha, also known as Sakyamuni, spoke the Sakyas @ Nagas language, which is Tamil.

  • We can continue to address and provide more examples and evidence, but I believe I have provided enough evidence from their own vedic scriptures for everyone to see how Indo Aryans have perverted and ruined Nagas@raksas@sakyas@yaksha@Dravidan@Tamil culture and god.
  • It's only fitting to end this post by proclaiming that Indran@indrajit@meganathan is a Tamil god, backed up by quotes from the very old and "ulaga podumarai" Thirukural.

ஐந்தவித்தான் ஆற்றல் அகல்விசும்பு ளார்கோமான்
இந்திரனே சாலுங் கரி
.

Aindhaviththaan Aatral Akalvisumpu Laarkoemaan
Indhirane SaalunG kari

Meaning in Tamil : ஐந்து புலன்களாலாகும் ஆசைகளை ஒழித்தவனுடைய வல்லமைக்கு, வானுலகத்தாரின் தலைவனாகிய இந்திரனே போதுமான சான்று ஆவான்.

Meaning in English : Indra, the king of the inhabitants of the spacious heaven, is himself, a sufficient proof of the strength of him who has subdued his five senses

  • Additional to this, would there be any other evidences required to prove that Indrajit @ Meganathan is the non-elightened Lord Indran? 

 Related post

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Relationship between Number 7, Sabtha Kanni & Assevagam

தாழ்த்தப்பட்டோர் ரவிக்கை அணிவதை விமர்சித்தாரா பெரியார்?

ARAVA NADU - ETYMOLOGY